The G77/China group expressed its reservations on paragraph 7, which requests the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA), under the Nairobi work program on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change, to consider activities aimed at enhancing a relevant knowledge base and information base on the technicalities of loss and damage. It believes that if loss and damage are put under SBSTA then its sprit of implementation under the mandate of SBI will be weakened.

 

Paragraph 8 of the text asks “the Adaptation Committee to consider the possible ways of increasing coherence and cooperation among existing institutional arrangements and frameworks within and outside of the Convention in addressing loss and damage”. The G77/China emphasized the need for an independent and stand-alone committee to work on the issues of loss and damage, arguing that if loss and damage are considered as issues “beyond adaptation” then it would be logical to form a stand-alone committee.

 

The group noted that paragraph 9 decides to establish an international mechanism to address loss and damage without any indication of its means of implementation and financial mechanisms. Paragraph 14 requests parties in a position to do so to support the implementation of the work program on loss and damage, which the group argued is against the spirit of the Convention. The group went on to note that the Convention should take necessary measures to ensure financial support for the implementation of the work program, adding that the text gave insufficient emphasis to several key issues like slow onset events, displacement and migration, and territorial loss. It also supported the inclusion of a compensatory mechanism to address loss and damage.